이데올로기적 접근을 통한 육친 간 상극관계 해석

Abstract

The six relatives of Myeongrihak belong to each of the ten provinces, and they form a win-win and mutual restraint relationship. In Myeongrihak, a saju is interpreted based on the ten-star logic of the six relatives. However, it is not easy to interpret the reason for the formation of a mutual restraint relationship between relatives. For this reason, consequential interpretations are rampant. Against this background, this study attempts to reinterpret the reason why husband and wife, father and son, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law mutual restraint relationship as an ideological approach.
 Through this, the purpose of this study is to present consistent interpretation standards and to lay the foundation necessary for resetting the ten stars of each relative in social change. As a research method, the mutual restraint relationship between relatives was interpreted based on the ‘duty’ that social ideology requires of individuals. The results of the study are as follows. The wife was set up as a property between couples because, under patriarchal ideology, obligations such as giving birth to a son after marriage and raising parents-in-law were given. Therefore, a husband who controls a wife based on patriarchal ideology can be interpreted as a management entity. And the presence of a son between a father and a son imposes an obligation to raise the father as the head of the family. In a patriarchal society, if it is not implemented, the head of the household loses authority. Therefore, the son who imposes an obligation to raise the father is a manager, and the father is wealthy. In the relationship of a mother-in-law, the mother-in-law imposes obligations on her daughter-in-law through her son. Without a medium (son), the daughter-in-law’s obligation to foster is extinguished. Therefore, the mother-in-law is wealthy and the daughter-in-law is a manager. The results of this study are meaningful in establishing a consistent standard (obligation according to ideology) for the interpretation of the mutual restraint relationship.