Προσδιορισμός της ανθρώπινης ή μη προέλευσης του κολοβακτηριδίου που απομονώνεται από το υδάτινο περιβάλλον με καλλιεργητικές και μοριακές τεχνικές

Abstract

Maintenance of the microbiological quality and safety of water systems is imperative, as their faecal contamination may exact high risks to human health as well as result in significant economic losses. The microbiological quality of water systems is evaluated by detecting their faecal pollution and especially specific faecal indicators such as Escherichia coli. Simple detection of faecal pollution is not sufficient in order to apply appropriate management plans to remedy the problem and to prevent any further contamination. Human faecal material is generally perceived as constituting a grater human health risk than animal faecal material, considering that it is more likely to contain human-specific enteric pathogens. Thus, it would be desirable to determine the source of the faecal material, especially for the assessment of risk for public health and for the development of monitoring plans. In the present study the development and assessment of Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Analysis (MAR – phenotypic method) and Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR Analysis (RAPD-PCR – genotypic method) were established as microbial source tracking methods. Firstly, parameters of the two selected methods were determined for the discrimination of E. coli isolates of known source (60 isolates from animal faecal material & 68 isolates from human faecal material). Hierarchical Cluster Analysis and Discriminant Analysis were applied for the classification of the isolates. With MAR analysis E. coli isolates developed different resistance profiles and were discriminated according to their source with an average rate of correct classification (ARCC) of 85.2%. With RAPD-PCR analysis two different 10-nt primers of arbitrary sequence were used (1254 & 1290) and the 128 E. coli isolates of known origin were classified as human and animal with the following ARCC: ARCC1254= 87.5% & ARCC1290= 81.3%. The discriminatory power of RAPD-PCR with the two selected primers was D1254=0.97 & D1290=0.90. Furthermore, the assessment of reproducibility of RAPD-PCR analysis provided satisfactory results with both primers, as RAPD profiles were identical for the same bacterial isolates. The assessment of specificity of the method resulted in the discrimination among RAPD profiles of E. coli isolates and other reference bacteria. The selected methods were applied for the classification and the source tracking of E. coli isolates, derived from tap water and raw sewage samples. In total 234 E. coli strains were isolated from tap water from 11 areas and raw sewage samples from four treatment plants (KEREFYT – prefecture of Attiki, PSITALIA - prefecture of Attiki, RIO - prefecture of Achaia and PATRA - prefecture of Achaia). With MAR analysis the 234 isolates were classified as human and animal in percentages of 46.6% & 53.4%, respectively. Classification results were different with RAPD-PCR analysis. With primer 1254 the classification was: 64.9% of human origin and 35.1% of animal origin and with primer 1290 the classification was: 60.3% of human origin and 39.7% of animal origin. Isolates derived from tap water of urban areas were classified in total as of human origin. On the contrary, in areas with many farm breeders many isolates were classified as of animal origin, indicating presence of faecal material in the water systems derived animal activities. As far as E. coli isolates from raw sewage samples are concerned, the majority of them were classified as of human source, indicating the possible presence of other human enteric pathogens as well. Taking into account the fact that there has been an effort in order to reuse treated sewage, it seems necessary a multi-stage process to renovate wastewater before it re-enters a body of water. There was an agreement of results of classification obtained form the use of the two different primers as the percentages did vary statistically (P>0.05). Comparing results obtained from the two selected methods, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), raising a question of the appropriate method for the typing and discrimination of environmental microorganisms. The present study demonstrates RAPD analysis as a simple, cost effective genotypic method with satisfactory discriminatory power, sensitivity and reproducibility. It can be applied for the analysis of a large number of bacterial isolates without the prior knowledge of nucleotide sequence of DNA to be necessary. Finally, it may fulfil environmental for the determination of origin of faecal pollution protecting water resources and public health.