Abstract
Dialectical duality as a specific methodological tool is widely demanded by criminal procedure science. The need for dialectic dichotomy is especially evident in the essential sections of the criminal procedure theory, primarily in the study of the types and forms (models) of criminal proceedings. However, a typology is not so much a theory of process models as a theory of the relationships that arise between these models during the general evolution of criminal proceedings. Based on this, the ideology of criminal proceedings is determined not only by the supporting concepts that underlie “typological ideologies”, but also by the complex relationships that are established between these concepts. There are complex multi-level relationships between the concepts of competition and inquisitionism. Criminal procedural ideology is ultimately only a volatile form of innovative (progressive) operation with invariable (conservative) basic concepts. According to our ideas, modern criminal procedural science approaches these relations sufficiently.
Highlights
Диалектическая двойственность как специфический методологический инструмент широко востребована уголовно-процессуальной наукой
Dialectical duality as a specific methodological tool is widely demanded by criminal procedure science
The need for dialectic dichotomy is especially evident in the essential sections of the criminal procedure theory, primarily in the study of the types and forms of criminal proceedings
Summary
Диалектическая двойственность как специфический методологический инструмент широко востребована уголовно-процессуальной наукой. Однако типология — это не столько теория моделей процесса, сколько теория взаимоотношений, возникающих между этими моделями в ходе общей эволюции уголовного судопроизводства. Идеология уголовного судопроизводства определяется не только опорными концептами, лежащими в основе «типологических идеологий», но и сложными отношениями, которые устанавливаются между этими концептами.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
