Abstract

The author examines the problematic aspects of the implementation by the representative of the claimant under the enforcement document of a special power to receive funds both in the course of enforcement in the presence of enforcement proceedings initiated in the relevant division of bailiffs, and in the order of presenting the writ of execution directly to a Bank or other credit organization. It is stated that there is no uniformity of judicial practice on the issue of recognizing the right of a representative to demand the transfer of funds due to the recoverer to the account of the recoverer’s representative in the event of the exercise of this power during the initiated enforcement proceedings. The article substantiates the provision on the involuntary nature of the Bank’s actions carried out in accordance with Article 8 of the Law on Enforcement Proceedings, as well as on the unreasonableness of the ban on transferring funds to the personal Bank account of the representative in the case of applying with an enforcement document to the Bank for the purpose of collecting in a simplified manner. It is concluded that there are no significant grounds for differentiating the considered options for collecting funds in order to determine whether the representative of the recoverer has the right to receive the money awarded to the recoverer.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.