Abstract
Abstract. Meat market operators are required to comply with food safety laws. And state control should be risk-oriented and carried out at all stages of the production and circulation of meat products and risks should be identified. The content of toxic elements should be strictly regulated in foodstuffs to ensure the release of safe products to consumers as a result of monitoring the implementation of permanent GMP/GHP and HACCP-based procedures. The introduction of the HACCP system allows market operators to ensure compliance with technological requirements for the production of canned meat, packaging, packaging that affects their safety, ensure the production of safe products of good quality through systematic control at all stages of production and storage. It should be noted that during the production of canned meat, the composition of ingredients, packaging, packaging for the content of hazardous substances such as toxic elements must be monitored. To ensure the safety of beef meat cans, the hygienic requirements for their production and handling, as well as the technological instructions for the safety and quality of beef, auxiliary components and ingredients, must be adhered to. Due to the contamination of foodstuffs with toxic substances it is necessary to establish their biological value and suitability for use by consumers in order to prevent food poisoning . The pressing question now is regarding the assessment and correlation of the toxicity parameters of various hazardous substances for the Tetrahymena pyriformis biological test object. Studies have found that the content of toxic elements of Plumbum, Cadmium, Arsenic, Hydrargium, Kuprum, Zinc, Tin did not exceed the normative parameters in the samples of canned meat from beef producers number 1 - 6, and producers number 7 - 10 noted their excess. The highest content of toxic elements was observed in the following manufacturers: in No. 7 - the content of Plumbum 2.78 times ( Р < 0.001), Zinc - 2.44 times, Arsenic - 1.70 times ( Р < 0.001), Cadmium - in 1.60 times ( Р < 0.001), Kuprum - 1.23 times ( Р < 0.001); in No. 8 - Arsenic content - 4.0 times ( Р < 0.001), Hydrargium - 3.33 times ( Р < 0.001), Plumbum - 2.92 times (p < 0.001),), Zinc - 2 , 89 times ( Р < 0.001), Cadmium - 2.60 times ( Р < 0.001), Kuprum - 1.74 times ( Р < 0.001) ; compared to control indicators, and Tin - 1.02 times compared to regulatory metric ; in No. 9 - Cadmium 2.40 times ( Р < 0.001); in No. 10 - Zinc 2.86 times ( Р < 0.001) Plumbum - 2.24 times ( Р < 0.001), Arsenic - 2.20 times ( Р < 0.001), Kuprum - 1.21 times ( Р < 0.01) compared to controls, and Tin content 1.09 times the norm. Therefore, canned beef canned meat at Nos. 7 - 10 are not scrapped and are not released. When determining the biological value of beef canned meat using the Tetrahymena pyriformis test object, it was found that canned meat of beef producers 7 - 10 had the lowest relative biological value of 66.13 to 68.09 %, and also manufacturers No. 1 and No. 3, respectively, 78.69 and 78.38 %. Keywords : canned meat, beef, safety, toxic elements, biological value
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
