Ресурсна насиченість особистості

Abstract

resource’s richness of the personality.The following methods are applied: psychological survey using suchtechniques as personal’s resource questionnaire, personality’s psychologicalresourcefulness questionnaire, diagnostics of existential resources’ indicatorsquestionnaire, virtue and strength of character questionnaire, crisis copingquestionnaire, psychology and personality questionnaire of uncertainty. Methodsof mathematical and statistical analysis such as multivariate analysis, onefactorvariance analysis, cluster analysis, classification analysis, and correlationanalysis have been applied. The study is based on the Bayer model, which turnsthe problem into a solution in which it will be solved.The results of the research: according to the multivariate analysis (factorweight > 0,70), which cumulatively explained 57,1% of the variance in thestudy group, it was found that factor 1 (44,3%) contains such components of resource’s richness as psychological survival resources, psychologicalresourcefulness, psychological well-being, coherence, existential resources,strength of character. The content of the second factor (13%) are the indicatorsof personal resourcefulness and intolerance for uncertainty. Systemic reflectionprevails over quasi-reflection and introspective reflection in individuals withhigh levels of resource’s richness. Changes in the level of resource’s richness aremost due to uncertainty tolerance (rank 100). The inter-correlation betweenpsychological resourcefulness and other components of resource’s richness is theclosest one. Uncertainty intolerance is the most closely related to psychologicalresourcefulness, the components of which are the interpretative codes of thesignificance of an event to man. Psychological survival resources are in onecluster with coherence. The ability of a person to use consciously availableown resources is conditioned by the level of his systemic reflection, which isincorporated into the resource’s richness through psychological resourcefulness.Conclusions. It is not important how many psychological resources a personhas, but whether, he or she knows about them and whether they can applythem according to their life situation. Resource’s richness is characterized as areflexively conditioned ability of a person to self-transformation.