Abstract

In a crucial paragraph (KrV, A 663-664 / B 691-692) of the first part of the “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic”, Kant discusses the specific status of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity. In doing so, he refers to an already proven argument and thus to other passages of the Critique of Pure Reason. In search of this argument the “Transcendental Analytic” but in particular the “first book” of the “Transcendental Dialectic” turn out to be possible reference points. Although this contextualisation demands further systematic and editorial reflections, it also allows the clarification of the status of the principles and their justification in relation to a subjective deduction. Kant offers with the subjective deduction, as introduced in the “Preface” (of the first edition of the Critique of Pure Reason) and again in the “first book” of the “Transcendental Dialectic”, a first argumentative strategy, which differs from the objective one but provides “some objective validity” (KrV, A 664 / B 692; Kant, 1998, p. 602) and therefore has systematic importance for the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity. My aim is to offer immanent strategies for a justification of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity in the framework of the Critique of Pure Reason.

Highlights

  • 14. Поступила в редакциюIn a crucial paragraph (KrV, A 663-664 / B 691-692) of the first part of the “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic”, Kant discusses the specific status of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity

  • The regulative ideas of God, world and soul build an immanent part of the “Transcendental Dialectic” of the Critique of Pure Reason

  • Kant explains the status of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity by referring to an already proven argument and to other passages of the Critique of Pure Reason

Read more

Summary

14. Поступила в редакцию

In a crucial paragraph (KrV, A 663-664 / B 691-692) of the first part of the “Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic”, Kant discusses the specific status of the principles of homogeneity, specification, and continuity In doing so, he refers to an already proven argument and to other passages of the Critique of Pure Reason. In search of this argument the “Transcendental Analytic” but in particular the “first book” of the “Transcendental Dialectic” turn out to be possible reference points This contextualisation demands further systematic and editorial reflections, it allows the clarification of the status of the principles and their justification in relation to a subjective deduction.

Introduction
The “Transcendental Analytic” as Possible Reference Point
Первая книга «Трансцендентальной диалектики» как возможный источник
Субъективное выведение и его многозначность
The Subjective Introduction and its Ambiguous Meanings
A Foreign Body in the “First Book” of the “Transcendental Dialectic”
Как возможна сама способность мышления?
How is the faculty of thinking itself possible?
Some Objective Validity — a Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call