Abstract

This study is part of a study to analyze the origin or genealogy of Japan’s ‘Hwangdo Confucianism’ that was ‘practical’ policy in Colonial Korea. Although Confucianism was a Confucian discourse in Japan in the Taishō and Early Shōwa eras that traversed imperial and colonial societies. It was implemented as a policy in Korea, where Confucianism was maintained as a central force in colonial society. Except in Japanese academic circles, there has been a unique theme in which the study was given only in the Korean academic community. This is because, above all, attention was focused on research related to the policy implementation of the Japanese Government-General of Korea targeting the forests of the central and local areas, focusing on researchers in the eld of Korean history. In the absence of related research in Japanese academic circles, there has been no interest in how the ‘Study in the Hwangdo’ was developing in the Japanese ideological circles at the same time. <BR>This paper intends to illuminate ‘Hwangdo Confucianism’, which has existed only as a research area in Korean academic circles, and its connection with the discourses of Confucianism and Confucianism in Japan in the Taishō and early Shōwa at that time. For this purpose, I would like to examine the discourse on ‘Hwangdo Confucianism’ in the Taishō and Early Shōwa Periods, particularly from a genealogical point of view with the 19th century Edo late Mito scholar Fujita Toko’s Kōdōkankijutsugi (1846).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.