Abstract

The article deals with the relationship between metaphor and discourse. The metaphor is characterized as the main element of discourse. In the analysis, the emphasis is on its understanding by Bakhtin, when the discourse appears as a “whole utterance”, as a “unit of verbal communication”, which has not meaning, but “meaning related to value – truth, beauty, etc. – and requires a reciprocal understanding which includes an assessment.” According to these positions, on the material of Pushkin’s “The Bronze Horseman”, the works of S. Dovlatov, the works of P. Florensky and others it is proved that the metaphor is a living phenomenon, that “metaphor is a paradigm,” it, “like rapids on a river, makes the recipient's mind boil” (P. Ricoeur). A metaphor is examined as a means of enriching the productivity of philosophical thinking, and it can be a “body of philosophy” (T. Adorno).

Highlights

  • The article deals with the relationship between metaphor and discourse

  • The metaphor is characterized as the main element of discourse

  • The emphasis is on its understanding by Bakhtin, when the discourse appears as a “whole utterance”, as a “unit of verbal communication”, which has not meaning, but “meaning related to value – truth, beauty, etc. – and requires a reciprocal understanding which includes an assessment.”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Способствующее обогащению производительности философского мышления, и может быть „органом философии” Луиза Оляндэр / Метафора как основной элемент дискурса Бахтин вложил в свое философское определение дискурса, на наш взгляд, такой всеобъемлющий смысл, что все существующие определения поглощаются бахтинской дефиницией, не теряя при этом возможности служить инструментом для решения определенных задач, которые ставят перед собой специалисты разных наук.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call