Abstract
According to the group value model (Tyler & Lind, 1992), disputants who are able to confirm own group identity through proper treatment by group authority would perceive procedural justice and become more willing to accept group decisions. On the other hand, based on the social exchange model, people who are involved in disputes should expect support from group authority, and believe that they are entitled to governmental protection against injustice if they have supported the group. In this study, we predicted that sympathetic treatment by the judge in a civil action would have the effect of making disputants feel that their rights were protected, in addition to confirmation of own group identity. We asked 100 people who had experienced a civil trial, to rate the judge, procedure and final judgment, in order to examine the effects of sympathetic treatment by authority. Results of data analysis supported the group value model with respect to the overall satisfaction of the trial, and the social exchange model with respect to perceived justice of judges' final judgement.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
