Abstract
The article explores different aspects of impact of judicial practice on legislation. In view of the fact that the role of jurisprudence for the improvement of legislation is currently steadily increasing, the author comes to the conclusion that it is quite possible to talk about the formation of the mechanism of impact of judicial practice on legislation. When the appropriate mechanism is formed, the author proposes to determine three consecutive stages, each of which consists of interrelated structural-functional elements. At the initial stage of the mechanism of the impact of judicial practice on legislation, it is proposed to identify a gap in law or the sphere of public relations that are not normatively regulated in the legislation. In the process of forming judicial practice, such imperfections of legislation are overcome, and the legal provisions that in the future can be used in various ways to improve legislation are formulated. The totality of various ways of systematization of legal provisions constitutes the second stage of the mechanism. The final stage of the mechanism of the impact of judicial practice on legislation involves court practice into the legislative process.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have