Пробелы в вузовской криминологической науке

Abstract

Purpose. To offer the reader the most relevant directions of research and development for criminological science and practice in very specific conditions of a higher educational institution, which, for a number of objective and subjective reasons, has become one of the most important institutions where criminological science can develop with sufficient efficiency. Methodology: dialectics, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis. comparative legal and formal logical methods. Conclusions. 1. The current institutional mechanism for conducting criminological research and development in the Russian Federation (individual research, departmental criminological science of law enforcement bodies, criminology at universities) is quite intensive, but not quite always, with sufficient grounds, it changes. Moreover, without proper methodological and other necessary support. 2. The overwhelming majority of criminologists are currently combining educational and scientific work, which, without proper organizational and managerial adjustments, reduces the efficiency of their scientific and pedagogical activities. 3. For all the shortcomings of the university criminological science, there are also a number of its indisputable advantages (preferential planning from below, greater efficiency, maximum interest of the author in the implementation of the results obtained in practice). Scientific and practical significance. University criminological science, with its proper organization and self-organization, is most effective in comparison with other types of scientific research. This efficiency is both economic, political and organizational in nature, both in terms of social order and the assessment of the results obtained.