Abstract

The effectiveness of self-stimulating environmental regimes in unsteady economic systems is considered in the article on the basis of the conducted behavioral experiment. It is shown that rational choice, as a methodological basis is not always a sufficient prerequisite for the development of effective environmental regimes. It is substantiated that the initial level of well-being may determine the preferences of economic entities regarding environmental benefits. It is noted that in conditions of low priority of social welfare and ecology, at the individual level there is no reason to believe that collective actions to increase the supply of environmental goods will be successful. It is revealed that the potential for replication of altruistic strategies is rather weak, and they are almost entirely offset by rent-invading behavior, while collective actions do not generate a proper emergent order in which opportunistic behavior would be subject to more stringent restrictions. In general, the results of the experiment indicate an increase in the effect of the gap between the individual rational rent-invading choices and the collective result, which leads to the degradation of the environment, which accordingly calls into question the expediency of creating a decentralized mechanism for financing the benefit of «clean ecology» in Ukraine. It is substantiated that in the short term, the very tools of environmental policy that will be based on the use of individuals to benefit from the implementation of such a policy and pushing them out will be potentially successful. However, in the long run, the improvement of the situation in the field of environmental goods may be based on changes in preferences that are not always strictly determined by the level of income, in particular, environmental policy should be associated with those changes in institutional quality and education that would be relevant to changes in preferences.

Highlights

  • За полвека развития глобальной экологической политики уже создан широкий круг имплементационных механизмов различного уровня

  • Актуализирует цель исследования – на основе поведенческого эксперимента изучить потенциал механизмов, которые, кроме рыночной природы, включают вариант альтруистической мотивации к поддержанию экологического равновесия, в частности проверке готовности экономических субъектов финансово поддерживать общественное благо "чистая экология", а также проверить уровень начального лояльного отношения к рентоориентованному поведению, что может иметь мультипликационный эффект в условиях открытой игры – когда каждый участник наблюдает за тактикой другого

  • The effectiveness of self-stimulating environmental regimes in unsteady economic systems is considered in the article on the basis of the conducted behavioral experiment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

За полвека развития глобальной экологической политики уже создан широкий круг имплементационных механизмов различного уровня. Результаты поведенческих экспериментов свидетельствуют, что рациональный выбор как методологическая основа не всегда является достаточным условием для разработки действенных экологических режимов (Tversky, Kahneman, 2000).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.