Abstract
Comprehended in the article one of the substantial arguments against the scientific status of philosophy used in domestic debates at the turn of XIX-XX and XX-XXI centuries – namely, an indication of the ambiguity, uncertainty, imprecision, vagueness, philosophical language. As extreme version of this criticism – and at the same time as one of its sources – we consider the poststructuralist-postmodern complex ideas. The latter is specified and critically analyzed in the article on the example of the interpretation of G. Deleuze and F. Guattari’s philosophy as «creative concepts» (intellectual structures, independent of objective reality and existing in «terms of immanence», i.e. the individual «field of consciousness» of a thinker). Proposed in the article criticism of this approach are able partially to counteract the arguments of the modern Russian opponents of the scientific status of philosophy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
