Государственный режим и стиль управленческой деятельности: трудности демократической трансформации

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze the scientific relevance and practical relevance for the modern system
 of public administration mainstreaming mode of governance and management style, their forms and
 manifestations in practice. Thus explores the underlying quality characteristics and stylistic peculiarities of
 functioning of the state apparatus, the difficulty of optimizing performance, problematic and contradictory
 nature of overcoming corruption and bureaucratic pathologies, threats, dysfunctions and other deformations
 in the practice of public administration. It is emphasized that at some point the corrupt and bureaucratic
 mechanisms become latent shadow control system, which resist very difficult. In the result remain on top of
 the bureaucracy, the corruption, the brutality, the callousness and irresponsibility, and the bottom begins to
 dominate legal nihilism, distrust of authorities, double standards.
 Analyzing the distinguished types of styles, the author stops at the optimally-effective style performance
 focuses on the value of the benefits and ways of learning, introduces into scientific circulation the concept
 of “style of meanness and hypocrisy” – style, based on lies, double standards, fraud, provocations and
 corruption.
 This article presents some value judgments made appropriate generalizations and conclusions, analyzes
 the actions taken by a state in respect of establishing proper order in the system of public administration
 and public service. Formulated proposals which, in the opinion of the author, will help accurately implement
 the tasks put by the state in terms of democratic governance and innovation updates of the struggle against
 formalism, bureaucratic abuse, corruption, hardware isolation.