Abstract

The purpose of this article is an attempt to outline the specifics of artistic mapping in contemporary literature through conceptualization to understand the „map” and territory "in the context of geopoietics studios. Philosophical and cultural works, which supplement the theoretical and methodological base of geopoetics, were chosen as the methodological basis for the research. Metaphor „A map is not the territory” (Alfred Korzybski) serves to explain the representation of the world, the description of reality. Artistic expictations of cartography are considered on the material of the works „Voroshilovgrad” by Sergey Zhadan, „The Map and the Territory” by Michel Welbeck, „Certain Judgments about Byzantium” by Velimir Churgus Kazimir. This article analyzes the problem of reality and literature interrelation and the problem of man and landscape relations. It is memory and place through the landscape that allow to connect local, ethnic and global aspects into a single whole. Cultural and civilization projections, map and territory designs are perceived in modern humanities as a manifestation of struggle and mutual overlay of „tree” and „root” cultures. The research of the transcultural communications in the artistic space, allows to define modern aesthetics as the universalistic functions. Local space and limited geo-cultural landscape inspires individual mythology of modern writers. In modern fiction we often observe incorporation of historical facts, fragments of pseudo-documents, description of real landscapes and maps of invented territories into the text.

Highlights

  • Методологічною основою дослідження обрано філософськокультурологічні праці, які увиразнюють теоретико-методологічну базу геопоетики, а саме: студії Е

  • виявом актуальності принципу нонселекції загалом і продуктивних постмодерних метафор зокрема стало відзначення М. Уельбека Гонкурівською премією за роман-пастиш

  • альтернативної історії та географії, що поєднує історичні факти минулого і географічні об'єкти з фрагментами псевдодокументів, карт вигаданих чи ймовірних територій

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Методологічною основою дослідження обрано філософськокультурологічні праці, які увиразнюють теоретико-методологічну базу геопоетики, а саме: студії Е. Мішеля Уельбека (Уельбек, 2011), „Певне судження про Візантію” Велімира Чургуса Казимира (Казимир, 2004).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.