Abstract

Issues of criminal liability for acts, the single (initial) commission of which entails administrative liability, have in recent years moved from the category of purely doctrinal to law enforcement. At the same time, their severity does not decrease, since in many respects the possibility of his correction and taking the path of respect for rights and freedoms depends on the choice of the most appropriate (expedient, fair, etc.) measure of responsibility for the offender. Taking into account the initial refusal of the Russian legislator to use administrative prejudice when constructing rules on criminal liability and the subsequent “rehabilitation” of this approach, it makes sense to turn to the history of the formation and development of this approach in the Soviet period. The article critically evaluates the doctrinal point of view about the “broad” experience of using administrative prejudice in the construction of the norms of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1960; The characteristic features of norms with administrative prejudice are noted, as well as the specificity of the social relations they protect.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.