Abstract

The Russian cities are connected by many telecommunication lines. The information flow between any two cities can be sent via multiple routes, including those running through the networks of other countries. Cross-border transitions are created to connect the Russian lines with the international networks. The effect of these transitions on the connectivity of the cities has not been analysed earlier, either for Russia or for any other country. Using my own database on the Russian telecommunication lines, the Rosstat data on the cities’ population, and the results of the scanning of the Internet topology, I attempt to assess the effect of these transitions on the connectivity of the Russian cities. The assessment is carried out at the physical, economic, and digital levels of connectivity. For each level, I calculate the proportion of cities and their residents interacting directly with international telecommunication networks. Of the three categories of physical connectivity, the system of the Russian cities is associated with the worst option — the exogenous connectivity. This is explained by the impossibility of connecting the Kaliningrad region with mainland Russia without using international networks. An analysis of the traffic redistribution between the core cities of the autonomous systems shows that closed flows and internal economic connectivity are predominant in Russia. The calculation of information flow delays between all the Russian cities and the cores of the national and international digital agglomerations makes it possible to establish what cities are affected by the international cores. I conclude that the cross-border transitions have little effect on the information and communication connectivity of the Russian cities.

Highlights

  • For any state, the connectivity of the socioeconomic objects operating on its territory is a major priority

  • The physical connectivity of the cities of the Russian Federation will be upgraded to the second category if an SFOCL running along the bottom of the Baltic Sea connects Saint Petersburg and Kaliningrad

  • Another possible change in the effect of transboundary links is associated with the use of ‘big data’ and the possibility to processes the quantitative characteristics of the fibre optic communications lines (FOCL) information flows handled by each Russian communications service provider

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The connectivity of the socioeconomic objects operating on its territory is a major priority. A state may have self-sufficient physical connectivity (see Fig. 1, A) combined with externally dependent economic connectivity (see Fig. 1, C) This calls for a study into the second level of connectivity, at which a provider can have a local (servicing one city) or a regional (servicing several cities) network. It is crucial to understand that the connection between two cities by a telecommunications line and the distribution of Internet traffic between them does not preclude the provision of services generated in one city to a different city This relates to the breakthrough information and communications technologies and the associated future services: the Tactile Internet, the Internet of Nano-Things, virtual reality, augmented reality, holographic calls, interactive applications for 5G devices, e-health, and self-driving high-speed transport [5,6,7,8,9,10].

40 Nevelsk — Ishikari
Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
The Tactile Internet
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call