Abstract
Currently, the problem of differentiating administrative and disciplinary liability, as well as the problem of bringing civil servants to justice, is considered quite relevant. The purpose of this work is to find possible solu-tions to the above problems. The research involves the following methods of scientific knowledge: concrete-sociological, statistical, formal-logical and comparative-legal methods. We form the opinion that the list of types of ad-ministrative liability applied to civil servants is open and controversial. We identify mandatory and additional signs of an administrative offense and distinguish between an administrative offense and a disciplinary offense. We establish that the mandatory basis for applying measures of administrative liability of a civil servant is the implementation of an administrative tort due to inaction or inaction in the exercise of such professional duties in the service. We also conclude that civil servants should be brought to disciplinary liability for violations related to their official activities, and to administrative liability – on an equal basis with citizens on a general basis. In addition, the institution of administrative liability needs legislative revision and more intensive study in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.