Эффективность правового регулирования административной ответственности служащих государственного аппарата

Abstract

Currently, the problem of differentiating administrative and disciplinary liability, as well as the problem of bringing civil servants to justice, is considered quite relevant. The purpose of this work is to find possible solu-tions to the above problems. The research involves the following methods of scientific knowledge: concrete-sociological, statistical, formal-logical and comparative-legal methods. We form the opinion that the list of types of ad-ministrative liability applied to civil servants is open and controversial. We identify mandatory and additional signs of an administrative offense and distinguish between an administrative offense and a disciplinary offense. We establish that the mandatory basis for applying measures of administrative liability of a civil servant is the implementation of an administrative tort due to inaction or inaction in the exercise of such professional duties in the service. We also conclude that civil servants should be brought to disciplinary liability for violations related to their official activities, and to administrative liability – on an equal basis with citizens on a general basis. In addition, the institution of administrative liability needs legislative revision and more intensive study in practice.