Κλινική μελέτη των καλυμμένων με φαρμακευτικές ουσίες ενδοπροθέσεων στα κνημιαία αγγεία

Abstract

Aim : The purpose of our study was to investigate the 6-month and 1-year angiographic and clinical outcome in the setting of a controlled clinical study. The study examined the safety and relative effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents opposed to conventional metal stents, in the infrapopliteal vessels, in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). The stents were used in a bail-out setting during infrapopliteal endovascular procedures, i. e. stenting was carried out in cases of suboptimal angioplasty results (recoil - residual stenosis >30%, or in cases of dissection, after angioplasty). Patients and Methods: Twenty-nine patients comprising 8 women and 21 men with a mean age of 68.7 years were submitted to infrapopliteal revascularization with conventional (bare) metal stents, called group B. In these patients 65 lesions were treated with bare stents, of whom 38 stenoses and 27 occlusions, in a total of 40 infrapopliteal vessels. Another 29 patients, again 8 women and 21 men, with a mean age of 68.8 years were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents, named group S. There were 66 lesions in this group with 46 of them stenoses and 20 occlusions, in a total of 41 arteries. Patients were followed-up with clinical examination and intrarterial angiography 6 months and 1 year after the procedure. Both results were subsequently analyzed statistically. 135 Results: Co morbidities like symptomatic cardiac and carotid disease, as well as hyperlipidemia were more prominent in group S (p<0.05). Technical success was 96.6% (28/29 limbs) in group B against 100.0% (29/29 limbs) in group S (p=0.16). During 6-month patient follow-up: Primary patency was 68.1% in group B opposed to 92.0% in group S (p<0.002). Sirolimus-eluting stents exhibited higher primary patency with OR 5.625 and 95% CI 1.711-18.493, which was statistically significant (p=0.004). Binary in-stent restenosis rate was 55.3% while in-segment restenosis was 66.0%, in patients who had received bare metal stents. In opposition the respective restenosis rates, in patients with sirolimus-eluting stents were 4.0% and 32.0%. Diminished in-stent (OR 0.067 with 95% CI 0.021-0.017) and insegment (OR 0.229 with 95% CI 0.099-0.533) binary restenosis were both statistically significant with p values being p<0.001 and p=0.001 respectively. Collective target lesion re-intervention (TLR) at 6 month follow-up was 17.0% in group B against 4.0% (OR 0.057 with 95% CI 0.008-0.426) in group S, which proved again statistically significant for sirolimus stents (p=0.02). Six-month limb salvage rate was 100% in both groups. Six-month mortality and minor amputation rates were respectively 6.9% and 17.2%, in group B versus 10.3% and 3.4%, in group S (p=0.32 and p=0.04, respectively). During 1-year patient follow-up: 136 SES were still related with better primary patency rate (OR 10.401 with 95% CI 3.425-31.589, p<0.001) and considerably lesser events of in-stent binary restenosis (OR 0.156, 95% CI 0.060-0.407, p<0.001) as well as insegment (OR 0.089, 95% CI 0.023-0.349, p=0.001) binary restenosis. Target lesion re-intervention (TLR), was much lower in the SES patients group during 1-year follow-up (OR 0.238 with 95% CI 0.067-0.841, p=0.026) . At 1 year follow-up there were no statistically significant differences among group B and group S regarding mortality (10.3% against 13.8%), limb salvage rates (100% vs. 96%) and minor amputation (17.2% vs. 10.3%). Conclusions: Sirolimus-eluting stents appear to limit intimal hyperplasia in the infrapopliteal vessels. The use of sirolimus-eluting stents decreases considerably restenosis rates in the infrapopliteal vessels and reduces the need for repeat interventions