Abstract
In the OS-EM method, reconfigured images may be different among reconstruction image processors because the programs are highly arbitrary. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in OS-EM algorithms among four different image processors using a digital phantom dedicated for SPECT data evaluation. The image processors used were GMS-5500A/PI (Toshiba), GENIE Xeleris (GE), e.soft (Siemens), and Odyssey FX (Shimadzu). Multiple images were reconstructed with OS-EM fluctuating the number of subsets and iterations. A region of interest (ROI) was placed on each image. The average counts, contrast, root mean square uncertainty (%RMSU), and normalized mean squared error (NMSE) of each ROI were calculated and compared with those of different image processors. There was no significant difference in contrast among the algorithms. However, the average counts and (%RMSU were significantly different among algorithms as the number of updates increased. In addition, the minimums of NMSE were also different among algorithms. In the OS-EM method, careful evaluation is necessary when using multiple image processors in research studies on the standardization of nuclear medicine imaging or in clinical applications.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
