치위생(학)과 학생의 치과위생사 양성 교육과정에 관한 인식

Abstract

본 연구는 치위생(학)과 학생들의 치과위생사 양성 교육과정 요소에 관한 인식을 조사하기 위해 2009년 4월부터 6월까지 치위생(학)과에 재학 중인 학생 934명을 대상으로 진행되었으며, PASW Statistics 18.0 프로그램을 이용하여 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 교육목표, 교육내용 선정, 평가에 있어 중부권이 가장 높게 수도권이 가장 낮게 나타났으며, 전문학사 학위과정이 학사학위 과정보다 높게 나타났다. 교육내용 조직은 중부권이 가장 높게 호남권이 가장 낮게 나타났으며, 학사학위 과정이 전문학사 학위과정보다 약간 높게 나타났다. 요소별로 살펴보면, 교육목표 요소는 직업교육, 도덕적 윤리적 요소에서 높게, 창의적 측면에서 낮게 나타났다. 교육내용선정 요소는 학습가능성에서 높게 내용의 타당성과 관련성에서 낮게 나타났다. 교육내용조직 요소는 계속성, 계열성, 통합성 순으로 나타났으며, 교육평가 요소는 학교평가 준거에서 높게, 국가시험 방법에서 가장 낮게 나타났다. The purpose of this study was to examine the awareness of dental hygiene students on the components of the dental hygiene curriculum. The subjects in this study were 934 dental hygiene students, on whom a survey was conducted in April and Jun, 2009. The collected data were analyzed by the statistical package PASW 18.0. The findings of the study were as follows: The students from the midsection of the nation put the highest value on educational objectives, selection of what to teach and evaluation, and the students from the metropolitan area set the lowest value on those components. The students who took junior college courses took a better view of those components than those who took college courses. In terms of the organization of what to teach, the students from the midsection of the nation rated it highest, and the students from the Honam area rated it lowest. And those who took college courses took a little better view of it than the students who took junior college courses. Among the components of the curriculum, the educational objective factor was rated higher in terms of vocational education, morality and ethics, and that was rated lower in terms of creativity. The selection of what to teach was rated higher in terms of learning possibility and was rated lower in terms of content validity and relevance. The organization of what to teach was rated highest in terms of continuity, followed by sequence and integration. The educational evaluation factor was rated higher in the area of school evaluation and was rated lowest in the area of national examinations.