Abstract
There is no doubt that expressing new ideas, exchange of opinions, and criticism of the scholars’ ideas are among the scholarly traditions that are influential in purification as well as dynamic and sublime development of any science. The science of jurisprudence and the jurisprudential opinions of jurists are not apart from this rule, either. Hence, in a fundamental research and through a descriptive-analytical procedure, the present writing undertakes to critically review the jurisprudential opinion of Professor Muhammad Ibrahim Jannati concerning the jurisprudential principles of stoning and tries to figure out to what degree the above jurisprudential opinion are compatible and consistent with the selected jurisprudential principles of that respectful scholar and the sources and evidences of Shī‘ī jurisprudential ijtahād (individual reasoning).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
