Abstract

The choice of the most convincing way to explain the source of moral requirements and jus­tify their universal character is the core of the ethical discourse. The constant relevance of this problem is considered as a prerequisite for raising the question of which of the interpre­tations of the value-normative nature of moral duties proposed by thinkers of the past and present can be truly instructive both for the academic community and a wide range of re­sponsible thinking and acting people. In this context, the Leo Tolstoy’s ethics is of un­doubted interest. His understanding of morality is a unique, it combines the intentions of ex­plaining and justifying the absolute priority of the moral law: the first intention is carried out by Tolstoy in the framework of building his own model of “true religion”, and the second one is made up by creating an original design of “reasonable faith”. The both concepts, con­sidered in their inseparable connection, are in the focus of the author’s research interest. The article attempts their logical reconstruction and systematic analysis to identify the fea­tures of the Tolstoy’s strategy of moralistic justification of the human existence. Its key prin­ciple is formulated by in the paper as the identity of truth and good. The latter is realized in the course of overcoming natural doubts by the moral figure that the importance of moral precepts really exceeds the significance and attractiveness of all other life preferences. The author’s intention also includes revealing the specifics of the proposed Tolstoy interpre­tation of the autonomy of the subject of morality and assessing its heuristic potential for the development of contemporary ethical theory.

Highlights

  • Предложенной Толстым трактовки автономии субъекта морали и оценку ее эвристического потенциала для развития современной этической теории

  • В статье предпринята попытка их логической реконструкции и систематического анализа с целью выявления особенностей толстовской стратегии моралистического оправдания человеческого существования

  • Причем классические кантовские представления об автономии морали, исходящие из убеждения в том, что, утверждая свободу доброй воли, человек выступает творцом собственного нравственного мира, ибо он сам задает своим действиям безусловную нормативность, весьма органично сочетаются в рассуждениях Толстого о природе человеческой нравственности с описанным Кристин Корсгаард теоретическим вариантом укоренения нормативной силы морали в автономии человека, квалифицируемой как присущая каждому из нас способность к выбору поступка на основе оценки соответствия его содержания представлению действующего субъекта о самом себе35

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Предложенной Толстым трактовки автономии субъекта морали и оценку ее эвристического потенциала для развития современной этической теории.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.