Abstract
Introduction: the article deals with the problem of violence in the workplace or in another place where the employee performs their labor duties. Statistics show that a significant number of people suffer from violence at work in both Russia and Kazakhstan. The problem of sexual harassment, if considered as a narrower part of the phenomenon of violence in the world of work, is becoming ‘visible’ in the countries of the post-Soviet space, especially in connection with the numerous statements of women who have reported harassment at work. The purpose of our study is to find legal solutions for those who have been subjected to violence and harassment at work since the greatest difficulties for them are: fear of stigmatization, the difficulty of recognizing violence and harassment on the part of colleagues and managers as ‘inappropriate’ behavior, the choice of the form of behavior for both the victim and the employer in a situation where violence has occurred, as well as the process of proving the fact of psychological or physical violence in conjunction with the necessity to expose the specified facts of private life for general discussion. Methods: empirical methods of comparison, description; theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic; special scientific methods such as the comparative legal method and the method of interpretation of legal norms. Results: we have shown that the legislation and practice of Russia and Kazakhstan in the field of protection from violence and harassment at work are not in complete conformity with international labor standards; formulated some proposals concerning available legal mechanisms to be used for the development of legislation aiming to ensure the protection of workers from violence and harassment. Conclusions: the labor legislation of Russia and Kazakhstan does not protect workers from violence and harassment at work, however, there are attempts made at the level of the executive branch to regulate the problem in a recommendatory manner. Practice shows that employers and employees seek dialogue on this sensitive issue. Judicial practice in Russia and Kazakhstan testifies to the low awareness among judges of the issues concerning protection of workers from such forms of violence as oppression, victimization, mobbing, and harassment
Highlights
Introduction: the article deals with the problem of violence in the workplace or in another place where the employee performs their labor duties
Statistics show that a significant number of people suffer from violence at work in both Russia and Kazakhstan
The purpose of our study is to find legal solutions for those who have been subjected to violence and harassment at work since the greatest difficulties for them are: fear of stigmatization, the difficulty of recognizing violence and harassment on the part of colleagues and managers as ‘inappropriate’ behavior, the choice of the form of behavior for both the victim and the employer in a situation where violence has occurred, as well as the process of proving the fact of psychological or physical violence in conjunction with the necessity to expose the specified facts of private life for general discussion
Summary
В. Защита от насилия и домогательств в сфере труда: вызовы и возможности для России и Казахстана // Вестник Пермского университета. ЗАЩИТА ОТ НАСИЛИЯ И ДОМОГАТЕЛЬСТВ В СФЕРЕ ТРУДА: ВЫЗОВЫ И ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ ДЛЯ РОССИИ И КАЗАХСТАНА. Судебная практика России и Казахстана свидетельствует о малой осведомленности судей в отношении проблем защиты работников от таких форм насилия, как притеснение, преследование, моббинг, харассмент. Подробнее [19]), в связи с чем представляет интерес вопрос о состоянии механизмов правовой защиты от насилия и домогательств в сфере труда в национальных системах этих государств. Приходится констатировать, что проблема насилия и домогательств в сфере труда ни для России, ни для Казахстана не является надуманной. Несмотря на столь негативные последствия, приходится констатировать отсутствие должного внимания к проблеме насилия и домогательств в сфере труда со стороны правительств России и Казахстана. Казахстан не ратифицировал Европейскую социальную хартию, поскольку не является членом Совета Европы, а Россия ратифициро-
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.