Abstract
우리나라의 부동산정책은 주거안정과 경기조절이라는 상반된 목표 사이에서 규제 완화와 강화를 반복해 왔으며, 주택정책이 부양책에서 2003년부터 규제책으로 전환되면서 각종 부작용을 유발하게 되었다. 본 연구는 부동산정책이 앞 정권의 관심사였다는 관점에서 부양책의 영향을 받던 정권 초기와 규제책의 영향이 가장 심했던 후기 수도권 및 광역시의 주택가격 변동에 어떠한 흐름이 존재했는가를 통계적으로 검정하여 그 차이를 비교, 분석해 보았다. 지역간 가격 변동의 연관관계는 규제의 효력이 발생하면서부터 전에 비해 현저히 단순화된 것으로 검정되며, 수도권의 가격 선도력이 강화되면서 경제력 편중으로 인한 지역간 불균형 현상이 뚜렷해진 현실을 시사한다. The government real estate policy has repeatedly relaxed and reinforced controls under the mutually contradictory targets. Switching over the supporting policy after the IMF crisis to the regulating policy from 2003, the government housing policy began to generate ill effects due to various regulations. This stud carefully investigates and statistically tests the transmissions of variations in the housing prices between the metropolitan areas in the early stage of the preceding administration, under the effect of the supporting scheme, and those in the late stage, under the effect of the restricting scheme. The distinctive feature between the two periods is found to be much simplified interrelationships of the price variations in the latter period. Consolidated leading role of capital sphere, by concentrated economic strength, suggest the obvious imbalance between variations in the metropolis housing prices.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
