Abstract
Purpose of the article. To find out the central issue of Malraux's Imaginary museum. Methodology. Historiographical analysis. Scientific novelty. This research overcomes stereotypes in interpretation of Malraux's Imaginary museum. It isn't metaphysic opus of eccentric writer. It is serious conceptualization of craft. Conclusions. Bazin, Krauss and other researchers don't understand completely, what Malraux's Imaginary museum means. Malraux wanted to approve his opinion on history of art. For this he decided to change representation of art history. The side effect of this investigation – successful technology of craft. It's also a side effect of his writer talent. That is why Malraux miss his invention in this field. Because, craft is organically to Malraux. Unfortunately, Malraux had not suggested the scientific theory of craft, but further scientific research of his technology necessary to create thistheory.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
