陕北黄土高原贫困农户生计策略对生计资本的敏感性——以佳县为例

Abstract

PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 陕北黄土高原贫困农户生计策略对生计资本的敏感性——以佳县为例 DOI: 10.5846/stxb202102040374 作者: 作者单位: 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（71803149）；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（19YJCZH094） Sensitivity of poor farmer's livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in the Loess Plateau of northern Shaanxi Province: evidence from Jia County Author: Affiliation: Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:陕北黄土高原自然环境严峻，是我国农村生活最贫困的地区之一，不同地理地貌村庄的贫困农户生计策略对生计资本的敏感性还缺乏相关的实证检验。基于佳县的调研数据，将样本划分为风沙区、丘陵沟壑区和土石山区三类村庄，在贫困户和非贫困户生计资本与生计策略对比分析基础上，结合二元logistic模型对贫困农户生计策略由纯农型向非农型转变的关键因素进行分析，研究发现：人力资本、金融资本和社会资本的增加对贫困农户非农型生计策略的选择有正向作用，而自然资本、物质资本的增加对非农型生计策略的选择有负向作用。风沙区和丘陵沟壑区的结果与总样本相似，土石山区贫困农户自然资本越丰富反而越倾向于选择非农型生计策略。不同类型村庄生计策略存在显著差异，不调整生计策略的贫困农户未来仍有70％选择扩大农业、林业生产。在进行可持续生计策略调整时，个体经营和外地打工是他们主要选择的方式，自然灾害和红枣市场不景气是他们未来愿意选择生计多元化的主因。 Abstract:The Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi has a severely natural environment and is one of the poorest rural areas in China. There is lack of relevantly empirical tests on the sensitivity of poor farmers' livelihood strategies to livelihood capital in different types of villages. Based on survey data of Jia County, this paper divides the sample into three types of villages:sandstorm villages, hilly-gullied villages, and rocky villages. The livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of poor and non-poor households were examined, and the binary logistic regression models were construed to analyze the key factors of shift from purely agricultural to non-agricultural livelihood strategies of poor households. It finds that the increase of human capital, financial capital and social capital had positive effects on the choice of non-farm livelihood strategies of poor farmers, while the increase of natural capital and physical capital had negative effects on the choice of non-farm livelihood strategies. The results for the sandstorm and hilly-gullied villages were similar to the whole sample. While the richer the natural capital was, the more they tended to choose non-farm livelihood strategies in the subsample of the rocky villages. There were significant differences in livelihood strategies among different types of villages, and 70% of poor farmers who did not adjust their livelihood strategies still chose to expand agricultural and forestry production in the future. When making sustainable livelihood strategy adjustments, self-employment and migrant working were their main choices. Natural disasters and the depression of red dates market were the main reasons for their willingness to choose livelihood diversification in the future. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献