Abstract

"稻鸭共生"是对我国传统农业稻田养鸭的继承与发展。在双季稻主产区湖南布置了稻田养鸭田间对比试验,以常规稻作为对照,采用投入产出法,分析"稻鸭共生"生态系统C的输入输出及循环情况。结果表明:"早稻-鸭"生态系统碳输出中,水稻籽粒C占42.21%;水稻秸秆C占38.42%;气态C(CH<sub>4</sub>和CO<sub>2</sub>)占18.50%; 鸭产品C仅占0.87%。"晚稻-鸭"生态系统碳输出中,水稻籽粒C占53.80%;水稻秸秆C占35.12%;气态C占8.67%; 鸭产品C仅占1.07%。两季稻作里,"稻鸭共生"土壤截存C量是2103.2 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>,水稻植株地上部分固定的C量是15109.96 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>,水稻根固定的C量是1261.34 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>,归还给土壤的鸭粪C量是229.87 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>。鸭子系统C输入主要来自系统外投入的饲料C,早稻季鸭所食的杂草C和害虫C分别为60.53 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>和2.75 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>,晚稻季鸭所食的杂草C和害虫C分别为3.64 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>和6.73 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>。对"双季稻-鸭"共生生态系统的碳收支与平衡的分析表明,"稻鸭共生"生态系统是碳汇,且固碳潜力大于常规稻作。;Raising duck in paddy field is a traditional agricultural model in China. This model can increase the efficiency of using paddy field while rice plant is growing. Field experiments on C cycling from rice-duck mutual ecosystem were conducted from May to October in 2010 in the double cropping rice region in Hunan, and a conventional rice field was used as control. The Input-Output Analysis method was applied in this study to analyze C cycling in both rice-duck and conventional rice fields. Throughout the plant growing season, neither chemical pesticides nor herbicides were applied in rice-duck mutual ecosystems, and the surface water was maintained about 10 cm in depth during the period of raising ducks. Ducks of 22-day-old were introduced into the paddy field based on the holding capacity of 450 ducks per ha 24 days after seedling of early rice transplantation. Ducks of 30-day-old were introduced into the paddy field based on the holding capacity of 450 ducks per ha 10 days after seedling of late rice transplantation. These ducks were retrieved after the complete heading stage of rice in the experiments. During the early rice growth season, the recycled C from weed and insects in rice-duck mutual ecosystems were 60.53 kg/hm<sup>2</sup> and 2.75 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The C inputs from urea, duckling, plant seedling and feed were 22.5 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>; 15.79 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>; 20.42 kg/hm<sup>2</sup> and 630.56 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. While the C outputs in the rice-duck mutual ecosystems consisted of 42.21% rice seed, 38.42% rice straws, 18.50%(CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>)and 0.87% duck. During the late rice growth season, the recycled C from weed and insect in rice-duck mutual ecosystems were 3.64 kg/hm<sup>2</sup> and 6.73 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The C inputs from urea, duckling, seedling and feed were 22.5 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>; 15.93 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>; 222.33 kg/hm<sup>2</sup> and 966.85 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, correspondingly. while the C outputs in rice-duck mutual ecosystems consisted of 53.80% rice seed, 35.12% rice straws, 8.67%(CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub>), 1.07% duck. Throughout the double cropping rice season, Soil C sequestration was 2103.2 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, and C sequestration by rice straws and rice seeds was 15109.96 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, by rice root was 1261.34 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>. The feces C introduced by duck growth was 229.87 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>. The C inputs from feeds were very high in the duck sub-system, which was 1597.41 kg/hm<sup>2</sup> during double cropping rice growth season. Analysis of C budget in double cropping rice-duck mutual ecosystems showed that rice-duck mutualism acted as a net CO<sub>2</sub> sink and possessed a better carbon storage potential.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.