Abstract
Objectives The purposes of this study were to explore the experience and recognition of adolescents using generative AI.
 Methods In-depth interview was conducted with 14 teenagers who are attending high school, located in A city B county, C city, using Colaizzi’s phenomenological research method. 14 teenagers have experience using gernative AI.
 Results The results, 3 essential themes, 6 sub-categories was found. Three essential themes were ‘imperfect learning guide’, ‘existing of utopia and dystopia’, ‘ambiguous using range of generative AI’. And six sub-categories were ‘the limitation of inorganic object’, ‘the third learning guide’, ‘change in human being life’, ‘new opportunity provision’, ‘guide absence of the ethics using’, ‘distancing of generative AI using’.
 Conclusions The discussion on AI literacy for adolescent is as follows. First, provide the education about accurate asking to generative AI. Second, provide the enthical using guide. Third, provide the education about the generative AI system machanism.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
