하나의 해체적 독법

Abstract

Attempts to read the language experience of the film MINARI from the perspective of Philosophy of Language in Wittgenstein can be proved sufficiently on the textual dimension. However, this study aims to argue that in reverse, the Ordinary Language of MINARI can be established as a reference text in understanding Wittgenstein's philosophy in toto. This is because MINARI and Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language share the homogenous dialectical worldview. The central methodology for this essay is to reconstruct the logical process of what kind of de-constructive interactions language and ordinary life go through in the drama of MINARI and Wittgenstein's Weltanschuung. Chapter 2, ‘Name and Substance’ will show that the identity of the subject 'I' itself to the world is situated in a variable relationship between Name and Substance. Chapter 3, ‘From Synchronicity to Diachronicity’ attempts to illustrate that the way of existence of life (drama) in the world of 'I' as a social community is altered from a synchronical state to that of the diachronical one through de-constructive processes. Chapter 4, ‘Space of Experience, Experience of Space’ will demonstrate that the space of experience in the perspective of 'I' and the experience of space in the perspective of the world are in a complementary relationship for each other. As a result of this study, it is possible to confirm the significant metaphysical affinity between the authorship of Lee Isaac Chung and Wittgenstein’s expression of life on the textual dimension.