Abstract

SUMMARY: In this article, Jan Kieniewicz offers an interpretation of the role of the intelligentsia in the situation of empire. For Kieniewicz, in the Polish case, the intelligentsia developed under the civilizational pressure of the empire and thus played the roles of both national harbinger and collaborator. The latter role manifested itself not only in some direct actions but also through the intelligentsia’s “silence.” Kieniewicz argues that the Polish intelligentsia was characterized by a silence that was reflective of its unique position under the civilizational pressure of East European empires. The silent Polish intelligentsia, according to Kieniewicz, was not a typical colonial group as it refused to recognize cultural distance or even a hierarchy between itself and its colonizers, and because it made sense of its existence in reference to Western values and not in opposition to them. The author sees the intelligentsia as a defensive force of a society against foreign domination. He believes that the fear of assimilation into the dominant nation characterized the dynamics of the Polish intelligentsia (in contrast to colonial relations in British India). According to Kieniewicz, due to the civilizational pressures of Germany and Russia as reflected in their educational systems, the Polish intelligentsia attempted to involve the masses in the national project and thus played a crucial role in shaping the Polish nation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.