Abstract
In the era of globalization in which the validity of the New Public Management (NPM) is suspected, comparative administrative research is necessary in order to strengthen the competitiveness of the government. This study presented the new national classification criteria for comparative administration as a social integration and political-administrative relationship, and classified 56 developing countries into four types through the fuzzy set ideal analysis method. As a result of the analysis, 10 countries with “integrated/administrative state” (Type A), 17 countries with “integrated/legislative state” (Type B), 16 countries with “non-integrated/administrative state” (Type C), and 10 countries with “non-integrated/legislative state” (Type D) were derived. This study contributes to future comparative administrative research by presenting new national classification criteria.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
