Abstract
The truth about the May 18th Gwangju Uprising(“5·18”) was eventually liberated in the late 1980s-documents and nonfiction books for the testimony of “5·18” were extensively circulated. This sudden flooding of testimony resulted from the problem that the government’s investigation was delayed and not satisfactory. The Committee for Democracy and Reconciliation(known as “Minhwawe”), established after President Roh Taewoo’s election, was in a contradictory position of suppressing the discussion and activity for illuminating the truth.BRWhile under the suppression once again, the testimony of “5·18” struggled to construct the history of people’s democratic uprising and the individual memories not fully converged into the history. The work for establishing an official history of “5·18” stood against the discourse of the national unity developed by “Minhwawe.” On the other hand, the work for archiving people who had participated in, experienced, and sacrificed themselves for “5·18” stood for those who were not represented by the nation nor by “the people”, and gave them some voices for their own testimony.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.