Abstract

The question of the meaning of history is one of the key philosophical questions that occupied Nikola Milosevic’s theoretical work in his later years. This question is a logical extension of Milosevic’s previous analyses of Marxist and other chiliastic ideologies. Pointing to the psychological and historical experience of human actions that do not contribute to a greater historical purpose (insofar as this can be empirically determined), and noting that it is necessary to ceaselessly build institutions of liberal democracy as a partial shield against historical evil, Nikola Milosevic suggested that the question of the meaning of history cannot be approached adequately if one skirts the issue of Man or the issue of Evil (that is, the problem of substantiality of Evil), nor can one disregard the issue of God’s existence and his relationship to Man and Evil. We contrast Milosevic’s elaboration of these problems, in the vein of polemos so characteristic of him, with the teachings of his philosophical antipodes, Nikolai Berdyaev and Sergei Bulgakov, in order to highlight the openness and dynamism of the issues he dealt with.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.