Abstract
Recent intensive lawmaking has led to a set of novelizations, particularly in defining terminology, that do not always comply with the fundamental requirements of legislative technique. Therefore, law-makers face significant challenges, while convicts’ penalties may be influenced by them. The article detects, substantiates, and illustrates examples of specific poor definitions. The authors propose alternative definitions. In addition, the study determines the main features of a definition, identifies common legal errors made while creating definitions, and describes various types of terms with theoretical and practical value for legislative technique. The authors suggest their own view on the approaches to advancing criminal legislation in creating definitions
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
