Abstract

이 논문에서는 제주건축이 가지고 있는 지역성에 대해 살펴보고, 건축개념으로서 건축의 제주성이 가진 가능성에 대해 연구하였다. 이러한 가능성을 탐구하기 위해 먼저 제주건축에서 논의되고 있는 지역성에 대해 정리하고, 이 논의들이 가진 한계를 살펴보았으며, 이후 칸트의 판단력 비판과 루이스 칸의 건축 존재론을 통해 건축의 제주성에 대한 새로운 층위를 분석하였다. 이 분석을 토대로 제주의 현대건축이 지향해야할 지역성의 토대를 정리하여 제시하였다. The purpose of this study is to explore the authenticity of Jeju architecture, to give attention to contemporary architecture that we inhabit, and to escape from existing architectural discourse of Jeju architecture. This study seeks the ontological thinking of Jeju architecture on the basis of the judgement of critique and ontology of architecture. The ontological thinking of Jeju architecture can be studied in the aspect of disinterested of authenticity and ontological question of authenticity. As a result of this study, two aspects in the ontological thinking of Jeju architecture are revealed. One aspect of the authenticity of Jeju architecture is laying in the disinterested area. Another aspect is that authenticity of Jeju architecture is revealed through the ontological question of Jeju architecture. These aspects mean the authenticity of Jeju architecture as thinking which represents ontological layer of Jeju architecture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call