朝鮮時代 朝貢體制와 對中國 使行

Abstract

Until now, I arranged the change of the international order, meaning, diplomatic form, specific diplomacy activity and looked into the change aspect of sahaeng(使行) through the text. I relieve the concluding remarks through simple arrangement and opinion about the sahaeng's record(使行記錄). The international order during the joseon Dynasty acted unlike modem meaning so that a moral concept and an idea concept was important. The international relationship in traditional East Asia was based on a Tribute system(朝貢體制) and was performed through a diplomatic form of sahaeng, The development of an issue, setting diplomatic goals, granting a name of sahaeng, and deciding the right time and size comprised the procedures of sahaeng, Especially, as the governing system of China, after the Ming Dynasty, was strictly based on documentation, the justification of sahaeng for delivering documents of the joseon Dynasty King was emphasized, while individual diplomatic activities of sahaeng's members were restricted. Sahaeng's importance mission was the transmit of the diplomacy document and was the achievement of an involvement diplomacy purpose, of the formality courtesy at the except. While the diplomatic role of sahaeng increased, messengers and other staffs had to experience various cultures during the period of sahaeng, and kept these accounts for the sahaeng's record(使行記錄). The document about the diplomacy was the diplomacy document(外交文書), sahaeng's document(使行文書), sahaeng's record. The sahaeng's record can distinguish detailly to an official sahaeng's record(公的 使行記錄) and an unofficial sahaeng's record(私的 使行記錄). Although Sasinbyeoldan(使臣別單), which is recorded in the diplomatic documentation of joseon's Tongmunhwigo(同文彙考), was not an official diplomatic document, it had the vale of an official sahaeng record. Sasinbyeoldan consisted of the byeoldan of sa sin, the mungyeonsageon(聞見事件) of seojangkwan, and the subon(手本) of yeogkwan, and was not restricted to any method of description. The official sahaeng record submitted to sengjeongwon formed the bases for private sahaeng records that were arranaged by individual sahaeng's members, and the sahaeng's members, who did not have the responsibility to submit records to seungjeongwon, left sahaeng's records in collections more freely. We need objective vocabulary because negative recognition is included in a yeonhaenglog, Sahaeng's records were a kind of an account of one's trip to China. They showed the joseon-China relationship and the overall cultural exchanges of East Asia in detail. They have meaning in that they show how the sadaebu(士大夫) of Joseon engaged in exchanges with Chinese scholars.