دراسة مقارنة لفعالية منهجية IMaRD وIMGSIE في مجال تكنولوجيا المعلومات

Abstract

The usefulness of two well-known approaches, IMARD and IMGSIE, is compared in this paper within the context of information technology (IT) domains. Techniques are essential for organizing project workflows, improving productivity, and producing the intended results. IMARD, which comprises phases like Introduction, Method, Analysis, Results, and Discussion, is widely used in scientific academic papers and professional research to guarantee methodical problem-solving. On the other hand, IMGSIE methodology which consists of phases Introduction, Method, Generalization, Specification, Implementation, and Evaluation—has become more popular in technical and IT engineering projects. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the relative merits and demerits of different approaches in IT-related projects, taking into account variables like project and papers success rates, difficulties in implementation, and overall project management effectiveness. Discussion of case studies of IT projects that use both approaches offers practical insights into their efficacy. Key findings indicate that IMGSIE is more appropriate for graduation it projects needing iterative refinement and flexibility, even though IMARD offers a systematic and complete approach. Questionnaire was distributed to supervisors who used the IMARD and PPDIOO methodologies to evaluate its quality and effectiveness. The most important differences between the methodologies have also been identified, as well as where and when each method is used. Key words: IMGSIE methodology, IMaRD methodology, IMGSIE Lifecycle, Research methodology.