Abstract
Res Judicata in criminal procedure, which prescribes respect for the legal force of judicial acts adopted in civil proceedings, ensures not only the right to judicial protection and the principle of legal certainty, but also the impossibility of resolving civil disputes about the law within the framework of criminal proceedings. As a result, the scale of the impact of the court decision on the criminal process should be determined precisely from the point of view of the limits of the legal force of the court decision in a civil case, and not from the point of view of what signs of corpus delicti can be established on its basis. The article examines the questions of what the objective limits of res judicata are, whether it can have subjective limits, and what significance the presumption of innocence has in establishing these limits.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
