남한 강단사학계 가야사 연구 비판

Abstract

In the 19th century, with the rise of the theory of Korea in Japan, the theory of invasion first created under the name of so-called modern history is the Imna-Japanese theory. It is a claim that Yamatowa ruled or managed the southern part of the Korean Peninsula based on Gaya in the southern part of the Korean peninsula from the 4th to the 6th century AD. It is an antihumanitarian invasion theory advocated by imperialist historians based on exaggerated, embellished, fabricated, and distorted articles in 『Nihon Shoki』 compiled in the 8th century. The ideology of Yamatowa, which sought to realize the ruling system with the emperor as the apex, is contained in the Imna Nihon Headquarters Theory, which is still adhered to by most of the academic circles of Japanese ancient history. In 1945, with the collapse of the Japanese Empire, the arguments that should have been liquidated were compiled in 『Imna Heungmansa』 in 1949 by Suematsu Yasukazu, who was active in the Japanese Government-General of Korea and Gyeongseong Imperial University.
 There is no primary literature or archaeological data to prove the Imna or orthodox opinion in the academic circles of Japan and South Korea. As a result, the history of Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla, Gaya, etc., and the real history of Gojoseon and the pre-Gojoseon that gave birth to those nations were damaged, and Korean history was established as a history of identity and heteronomy. Therefore, examining the reality of Gaya history and the core logic of the theory of Imna Japan through primary literature and archaeological data is inevitably a serious task to restore the original form of Korean history.
 This study approached the reality of Gayasa based on 『Samgukyusa』 and 『Samguksagi』, and analyzed the core logics of Kim Tae-shik and Lee Youngshik, who are talked about as authorities in Gaya history research, to dismantle the basis of Imna Nihonbu theory and set a new turning point in Gay history research. Its purpose is to create