Abstract
The article examines the peculiarities of modern court discourse. The most general concept for communication processes in the legal sphere is the concept of legal discourse. It was determined that court discourse is a verbal and symbolic expression of the process of communication during the court process, which is considered in a socio-historical, national-cultural, specific situational context, taking into account the characteristics and intentions of the communicators. It is emphasized that the main text of the document from a formal point of view is divided into three structural elements: introduction, main part, conclusion. The analysis of court decisions most often confirms the following information: violations of laws, offenses, crimes, statements that qualify the character and personal qualities of the plaintiff from a negative point of view. The issue of the structure of court decisions is revealed. The discursive approach to the analysis of the texts of court decisions allowed us to consider, first of all, situations of language-legal conflict in terms of all extralingual factors. In order to prevent or eliminate terminological and stylistic errors, to develop language recommendations for the correct use of legal terms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
