Abstract
This study aims to present problems in introducing the PLR in Korea after comparing and analyzing overseas cases. To this end, we analyzed the literature of 34 countries that are implementing the public loan compensation system and the cases of Taiwan, which is the first demonstration in Asia. The items to be considered for the implementation and operation of the PLR were the ground law, compensation data, compensation target, operating agency, and compensation. The following three implications are presented through the analysis of overseas cases. First, the ground law of the PLR should be discussed according to the situation of each country. First, The ground law of the PLR should be discussed according to the situation of each country. Second, when implementing the PLR, the items to be considered should be the eligible recipients, eligible material, method of calculation, and managed by. Third, the most problematic thing when introducing the system in Korea is the solution of differences between stakeholders. For a healthy publishing ecosystem of authors, publishers and libraries, which are interested parties, it is necessary to organize a social consultative body to discuss and coordinate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
