ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНЫЕ КОНСТРУКЦИИ И КОНСТИТУЦИОННЫЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЯ

Abstract

It is high time to discard the idea that constitutional norms unilaterally predetermine the construction of procedural models based on the law. The relationship between constitutional and procedural law is a two-way road. The content of constitutional procedural guarantees can be understood only through the categorical series of procedural science. The provisions of the procedural law reflecting the regularities of the construction of procedural models can become a constitutional provision. On the contrary, the constitutional norm expressing the essence of the procedural model is self-sufficient and applicable for the correct reconstruction, filling in the shortcomings of the procedural law. This idea is illustrated in the article when analysing the constitutionality of the legislator’s decisions affecting the problems of various procedural institutions, in particular, the limits of differentiation of procedural legislation, the determination of a lawful court in proceedings on bringing to administrative responsibility, the admissibility of evidence obtained in the framework of the tax procedure, the possibility of using the decisions of the UN Committee against Torture as a basis for reviewing the judicial act on new circumstances, indexation of alimony collected by a court decision in a fixed amount of money, proper guarantees in the procedure for holding judges accountable, arbitrability of quasi-bankruptcy disputes, etc.