복수노조하에서의 교섭창구단일화 방안에 대한 고찰

Abstract

The matters of Multi Union in Korea labor legislation history and labor movement history was delayed again during three years under tripartite consent among the representatives of the labor unions, management and the government except the Korean confederation of trade unions. As the matter of Multi Union and the payment for an officer in its exclusive duty were treated together the matter of workers that have definited period and part time workers, a policy of labor protection of government was necessary to review whether understood essentially the above matters or not. The matter of Multi Union was converted into a matter of unification of bargaining tables beyond its recognition. With the disagreement between the federation of Korean trade unions and the Korean confideration of trade unions, the delayment of multi-unions meant that the most workers' fundamental right was violated. Up to now, a Korea tripartite committee discussed the matters of how to operate them under the one unificated bargaining table. That is, it doesn't have greater part about individual bargaining pattern like Japan and Deutch. They put great weight on the exclusive bargaining representatives such as in America and Canada, and establishment of Institution was also proceeded by its foundation. Through the discussion, all of tripatite representatives has recognized that bargaining representatives have the right representing their group and also the duty of fair representatives. Once an opinion that we should accept was proposed check-off in Canada, but the employers opposed because it would cause strengthening of Union. Allowing multi Union allowance in enterprise unit was again delayed, it meant from the starting point its matter that we should review. It is necessary to draw agreement of tripartite representatives whether it approach matter of table unification or it solve through individual control bargaining in the matter of Multi Union. Agreement in details without solving any fundamental problems can cause the delay again, tripartite representation must establish a bridgehead for a consent through comprehension and concession one another.