Abstract
Introduction: in the year of the 460th anniversary of the birth of Francis Bacon, an English philosopher and lawyer, statesman and court practitioner, of special relevance is research into Bacon’s contribution to the development of theoretical and organizational bases of the law reform and the technique of law systematization. In his works, Bacon put forward a set of ideas concerning rationalization of common law and novelization of statutory law in early modern England. Purpose and objectives: to identify the features of legal discourse and dogmatic opposition between legal corporations of lawyers of common and civil law; to analyze their influence on the formation of Bacon’s legal worldview; to determine his contribution to the development of the concept of the ‘reform of law’ and the doctrine of the sources of law in Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence; to evaluate the content of his theoretical treatises and legislative proposals concerning the systematization of statutory and case law in early Stuart England. Methods: in the course of the study of Bacon’s development as a thinker and his career advancement, we employed methodological approaches such as dialectical, cultural, general historical, sociological, dogmatic. When analyzing Bacon’s legal ideas and doctrines, his legislative projects and theoretical writings, we applied both general scientific methods (system-structural and formallogical, inductive and deductive) and special legal methods of cognition: historical-legal, comparative- legal and formal-legal, as well as methods of legal hermeneutics, interpretation, and juris linguistics. Results: we have formulated the definitions of the ‘reform of law’ and ‘systematization of law’ in the context of the legal discourse of early Stuart England and specifically in the framework of Bacon’s teachings; studied the directions of Bacon’s activity aimed at improving the judicial procedure and evidentiary practice, at unifying the law within the Anglo- Scottish union, and also the special model of the gradual reform of English law developed by Bacon. He defined the proper legal and technical conditions for the systematization of law, the necessary elements of legalistics, and the ‘general part’ in the form of a list of legal maxims andregulis juris provided in his translation. Conclusions: according to Bacon, ‘schematism’ of reforming the law involved several successive stages. We have established the following scheme of legal systematization as the ultimate goal of the legal reform according to Bacon’s plan: review and revision of statutory law – chronological incorporation of statutes and precedents – thematic hybrid codification (or consolidation) – creation of a ‘digest’ (corpus of laws) as a final document.
Highlights
Francis Bacon (1561–1626) is a recognized developer of the scientific method of inductive cognition and the theory of experimental verification, the author of numerous works on general philosophy, political history, legal theory, parliamentary procedure, etc
Two books VII and VIII of The Codex systematized rules on criminal procedure, criminal offenders and punishment of crimes (16 titles) and the corpus delicti and penalties imposed (25 titles)[3]. Upon his return from the diplomatic mission, Francis Bacon continued his training as a lawyer in the Inns of Court, examining in detail the sources, statutes and precedents, constituted the substance of the “common law’ of England, taking into account the concepts he has received on the continental legal system
Holdsvourt rightly pointed out, among 16th-century lawyers Francis Bacon is by far the first; his only rival was Edward Coke
Summary
Н. Систематизация права Англии в начале XVII века: значение идей Фрэнсиса Бэкона // Вестник Пермского университета. Введение: в год 460-летия со дня рождения Фрэнсиса Бэкона, английского философа и правоведа, государственного деятеля и судебного практика, приобретает особую актуальность исследование его творческого вклада в разработку теоретических и организационных основ реформы английского права и технику систематизации права. Им выдвинут целый ряд идей по рационализации общего права и новеллизации статутного права раннего Нового времени в Англии. Определить его вклад в развитие концепта «реформы права» и учения об источниках права в англосаксонской юриспруденции, оценить содержательную сторону его теоретических трактатов и законодательных предложений по вопросам систематизации английского статутного и прецедентного права. Его законодательных проектов и теоретико -правовых сочинений были использованы: общенаучные методы (системно-структурный и формально-логический, индуктивный и дедуктивный), специальные юридические методы познания (историкоправовой, сравнительно-правовой и формально-юридический), а также методы юридической герменевтики, интерпретации и юрислингвистики. Результаты и обсуждение: сформулированы определения «реформы права» и «систематизация права» в контексте
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
