Abstract
The article reveals the features of abuses related to insolvency (bankruptcy) cases, gives the reasons for the limited normative fixing of measures to counter bad faith in these legal relations. The consequences and prerequisites of procedural dishonesty are analyzed. A distinction is made between abuses in insolvency cases, depending on the specifics of their occurrence.The problems associated with the use by the courts of the explanations of the highest court on the issues of determining the signs of insolvency are identified. Through the study of judicial practice, the use by the courts of the provided legal tools to counter abuses in the field of insolvency was discovered and described.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
