Abstract
In this paper, we mainly reviewed the problems of the time of the establishment of the Dajō Tennō. In the related art, a lot of attention was focused on the issue of ascension, but it was pointed out that the problem of re-ascending the throne was also important. In 645, Emperor Kyokoku abdicated to Emperor Kotoku for the first time in his history, and his post-submission status was “Omioya(皇祖母尊)”, and his independent status as a predecessor was not yet established. However, after the death of Emperor Kotoku, she was re-entered as Emperor Saimei. I presumed that Kyokoku's abdication and Re-enthronement were a precedent and left a deep impression on the ruling class at that time. Emperor Jito handed over the throne to his grandson(Emperor Monmu) in 697, when he was given the title of “Dajō Tennō”. It is confirmed that the relationship between the Dajō Tennō Jito and the Emperor Munmu was a “common rule” relationship, and in fact, the Dajō Tennō exercised power equivalent to the emperor. This “common rule” relationship is closely related to the fact that it is recognized as a relationship between the Emperor and the Queen, between the Emperor and the Empress. I mentioned that this relationship can be seen from the perspective of the multi-polar structure of kingship
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
