한국, 미국, 일본의 도시재생 모델 비교

Abstract

Currently, the topic of discussion in most developed countries is the urban regeneration project to prevent local extinction and urban decline. Unlike the resumption of the resumption and reconstruction of the urban regeneration in the improvement of the physical environment, the urban regeneration is aimed at the purpose of activating the central market, activating the central market, activation of the center of the right, It is a large-scale business that is done. Existing urban regeneration projects were planned by the government and implemented by local governments. However, the New Deal policy for urban regeneration implemented under the Moon Jae-in administration is a local government that is not the central government but is promoted by local governments together with local residents. It aims to revitalize and revitalize the city center. This study compares the cases of the United States and Japan, where urban regeneration projects were implemented before Korea, with those of Korea. Urban regeneration projects and policies of each country, enhancement of regional economic vitality through revitalization of commercial districts, support from local governments, participation methods of each project entity, and performance and continuity after the completion of the urban regeneration project were analyzed. However, since this study only compared public data published by each country with previous studies in related fields, it is insufficient to listen to opinions from stakeholders or analyze follow-up management. It is expected that better results will be obtained if interviews with related parties and on-site investigations are conducted in parallel.