암보험 약관의 개선 방안에 관한 연구

Abstract

It appears that the coverage of cancer claims is ultimately the need for hospitalization for the treatment of cancer, and that it is concluded whether by the hospitalization in the course of cancer treatment or after the treatment is closed, and the gravity of the patient’s condition, as shown in the Accepted and rejected cases. In conclusion, there seems to be no inherent difference between the phrase “for the purpose of treating cancer” and the phrase “for the direct purpose of treating cancer,” which eventually modifies the hospitalization.BR The need for hospitalization should be considered as a risk requirement for cancer treatment and as a requirement for cancer treatment. The treatment of cancer is treated through administration of anti-cancer drugs, radiation treatment, surgery, etc. In addition, the treatment of side effects associated with the treatment of cancer, or adverse events occurring in the cancer itself, can be considered to be included in direct cancer treatment.BR Hospitalization means that a patient enters and stays in a hospital for a certain period of time to cure a disease, and the need for hospitalization is considered as a separate requirement in the sense of hospitalization for the direct purpose of treating cancer.BR The need for hospitalization is required to be considered as a separate requirement in the sense of direct purpose hospitalization. However, when determining the requirements for hospitalization, it is necessary to broadly recognize the requirements for hospitalization by considering symptoms, difficulties in treatment or patient condition, depending on the broad-ranging criteria. If hospitalization is interpreted as essential to receive anti-cancer medication, there is room to unfairly reduce the scope of hospital admission.